Overview
This dossier contains confidential records for Amir Rahmani.
Material is provisional, cross-referenced from recovered files, protected records, and field notes.
COT / MI5 Case File
Restricted
Eyes Only
Maritime Evidence Dossier
Amir Rahmani
Subject: Amir Rahmani
INTERVIEW UNDER CAUTION — TERRORISM INVESTIGATION
SUBJECT: Amir Rahmani
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET // COUNTER-TERRORISM
REFERENCE: CONTROLLED COPY // COT/METROPOLITAN/2035/CTC010
Document control
CASE REFERENCE: COT/METROPOLITAN/2035/CTC010
SUBJECT: Amir Rahmani
CENTRAL RECORD: COT6624D0B773C3F
RANK / APPOINTMENT: Series-wide strategic antagonist
ORGANISATION: Black Dawn / Al Bahr-linked finance and logistics
ALIAS / CODENAME: Dr Elias Venn; Orpheus One
DATE OF BIRTH: 1988-06-17
PLACE / NATIONALITY: Classified, Classified, Middle Eastern; exact country not locked
INTERVIEW STATUS: Subject of investigation
LOCATION: Secure interview suite — location withheld
DATE: 29 September 2035
LEAD AUTHORITY: Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command
RECORDING MEDIA: Two sealed digital masters and one independent evidential hash
DISTRIBUTION: Named recipients only. No automated onward distribution.
NOTE: Handling notice. This document contains operational, personal and evidential material. It may be read only by a person with both the required clearance and a recorded need to know. Extraction of images, transcript segments or metadata creates a new controlled copy.
Identity and visual evidence control
VISUAL ASSET STATUS: Passport image: attached; dossier image frames available: 3; surveillance frames available: 1; identity match: matched by subject/asset map.
Reason for interview or reconstruction
This record concerns identity fraud, conspiracy to interfere with maritime and transport systems, possession or control of legacy government credentials, and the use of commercial logistics and protected routes to move people, equipment and authority without ordinary inspection. The scope of this record is confined to the matters set out above and to evidence formally introduced during the session.
Preliminary investigator note
The subject completed identity verification but challenged the assumption that a valid administrative record necessarily described the physical event.
Recorded interview transcript
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: State your full name for the record.
AMIR RAHMANI: Amir Rahmani
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you understand the status of this interview and the limits placed on distribution?
AMIR RAHMANI: Yes. Record that I have asked for the original media and audit trail to be preserved.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Have you been offered the representation, legal advice or staff support applicable to this procedure?
AMIR RAHMANI: Yes.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Before we turn to the documentary record, explain your involvement in the Elias Venn identity.
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. Check identity against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Before we turn to the documentary record, explain your involvement in legacy pilot-continuity credentials.
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Before we turn to the documentary record, explain your involvement in Al Bahr logistics routes.
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Before we turn to the documentary record, explain your involvement in maintenance systems used as authority channels.
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Before we turn to the documentary record, explain your involvement in the subject's relationship with Leonie Murchison and Jonas Kriel.
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-01 Retained extract: Amir Rahmani “The Man Behind the Smoke” MI5 Intelligence Analysis Division – 14:30 Fiona Ward leaned over a bank of monitors, the light from the screens painting her face in pale blue. Associated persons: Fiona Ward Relevant systems or locations: Al Bahr Logistics, MI5
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: What did you understand at that moment, before later analysis supplied a larger explanation?
AMIR RAHMANI: I recognise the event. I do not accept your description of my purpose. Check Al Bahr Logistics against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-02 Retained extract: Amir Rahmani “The Man Behind the Smoke” MI5 Intelligence Analysis Division – 14:30 Fiona Ward leaned over a bank of monitors, the light from the screens painting her face in pale blue. Associated persons: Fiona Ward, Emily Patel Relevant systems or locations: Al Bahr Logistics, MI5
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Who else was physically present and capable of confirming your account without relying on the same electronic record?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying the record should remain evidence, not become an alibi for the system that produced it.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-03 Retained extract: He’s a financier,” Fiona explained to the small task force now gathering around the central display. “Amir Rahmani,” she continued, tapping a photo that had taken three separate database pulls to assemble. “Iranian-born. Associated persons: Daniel Sykes, Commander Lydia Green Relevant systems or locations: MI5
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: I recognise the event. I do not accept your description of my purpose. Check MI5 against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Why was the matter not escalated through the ordinary reporting route?
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. Check MI5 against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-04 Retained extract: He’s a financier,” Fiona explained to the small task force now gathering around the central display. “Amir Rahmani,” she continued, tapping a photo that had taken three separate database pulls to assemble. “Iranian-born. Associated persons: Daniel Sykes, Commander Lydia Green
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: What part of the retained record is incomplete or misleading?
AMIR RAHMANI: I recognise the event. I do not accept your description of my purpose. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying you should preserve the contradiction instead of choosing the tidier version.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-05 Retained extract: Her eyes remained fixed on the grainy image of Rahmani—lean, impeccably dressed, his gaze flat and unreadable.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Which physical record should be examined before this account is treated as settled?
AMIR RAHMANI: I recognise the event. I do not accept your description of my purpose. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-06 Retained extract: One of them included a flagged transfer connected to Amir Rahmani.” “She buried it?” “No trace left on the primary network. Associated persons: Fiona Ward, Daniel Sykes Relevant systems or locations: Al Bahr Logistics, MI5, archive, evidence
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. Check Al Bahr Logistics against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Did anyone instruct you to describe the incident differently afterwards?
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying two honest records can disagree when they were generated from the same compromised source.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-07 Retained extract: finally—“Rahmani.” Sykes froze. Associated persons: Daniel Sykes
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: What did you understand at that moment, before later analysis supplied a larger explanation?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-08 Retained extract: And before he bled out, he gave me a name—Rahmani.” That got a flicker. Associated persons: Fiona Ward, Daniel Sykes, Commander Lydia Green Relevant systems or locations: Al Bahr Logistics, MI5
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Who else was physically present and capable of confirming your account without relying on the same electronic record?
AMIR RAHMANI: I recognise the event. I do not accept your description of my purpose. Fiona Ward can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying two honest records can disagree when they were generated from the same compromised source.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-09 Retained extract: And if Rahmani’s name is on this, I’m not waiting for a fucking government memo to chase him down.” Ward moved in front of the door, blocking his path. “If you go after him without clearance, you’re done. Associated persons: Fiona Ward, Daniel Sykes, Elaine Morris Relevant systems or locations: Al Bahr Logistics
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Why was the matter not escalated through the ordinary reporting route?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-10 Retained extract: Morris killed the Rahmani lead. Associated persons: Natalie Brooks, Elaine Morris Relevant systems or locations: AIS, MI5, MCA, Felixstowe
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: What part of the retained record is incomplete or misleading?
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying it may be accurate about the event and wrong about the cause.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-11 Retained extract: Not since Rahmani’s name surfaced. Associated persons: Daniel Sykes
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Which physical record should be examined before this account is treated as settled?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-12 Retained extract: Rahmani – Harbortown Freight Services (Felixstowe Division) His stomach dropped. Associated persons: Daniel Sykes Relevant systems or locations: AIS, Felixstowe
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Did anyone instruct you to describe the incident differently afterwards?
AMIR RAHMANI: The authority was accepted by your systems. Ask the people who designed them why. Check AIS against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying it may be accurate about the event and wrong about the cause.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-13 Retained extract: But none of that mattered to Amir Rahmani. Relevant systems or locations: MI5, Rotterdam
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: What did you understand at that moment, before later analysis supplied a larger explanation?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-14 Retained extract: Rahmani finally spoke. “They're drowning in their own intelligence. Relevant systems or locations: MI5, Rotterdam
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: I recognise the event. I do not accept your description of my purpose. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Who else was physically present and capable of confirming your account without relying on the same electronic record?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying you should preserve the contradiction instead of choosing the tidier version.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-15 Retained extract: But inside, it was all cold calculation. “Timeline?” asked the businessman. “Seventy-two hours,” Rahmani replied. “Everything’s already in place. Relevant systems or locations: Whitehall
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Why was the matter not escalated through the ordinary reporting route?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-16 Retained extract: But inside, it was all cold calculation. “Timeline?” asked the businessman. “Seventy-two hours,” Rahmani replied. “Everything’s already in place. Associated persons: Daniel Sykes Relevant systems or locations: Whitehall
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
AMIR RAHMANI: You have a record and an assumption. They are not yet the same thing. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: What part of the retained record is incomplete or misleading?
AMIR RAHMANI: If you had proof of direction, you would not be asking me to provide it. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
AMIR RAHMANI: I am saying two honest records can disagree when they were generated from the same compromised source.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Is there any material fact you have withheld because you consider this recording or its distribution unsafe?
AMIR RAHMANI: Yes. The existence of that fact is the most I will place in this copy.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: What is the single next action this investigation should take?
AMIR RAHMANI: Compare the surveillance timeline with access, maintenance and movement records before drawing a conclusion.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER: Do you wish to add or correct anything before the recording is suspended?
AMIR RAHMANI: Record the pauses as well as the words.
[Recording suspended. Source media sealed. Any resumed session requires a new opening declaration and exhibit schedule.]
Supplemental visual evidence exhibits
Confidential investigator assessment
The interview produced useful corroboration points and several testable contradictions. It did not establish final responsibility for the events examined.
Actions and inconsistencies outstanding
- Obtain or compare the independent account of Daniel Sykes; do not disclose this transcript before their unaided account is fixed.
- Obtain or compare the independent account of Fiona Ward; do not disclose this transcript before their unaided account is fixed.
- Obtain or compare the independent account of Commander Lydia Green; do not disclose this transcript before their unaided account is fixed.
- Preserve and independently verify the original record associated with MI5, including audit history and physical custody.
- Preserve and independently verify the original record associated with Al Bahr Logistics, including audit history and physical custody.
- Preserve and independently verify the original record associated with AIS, including audit history and physical custody.
NOTE: Finding limit. Nothing in this record establishes guilt, operational direction or final causation unless expressly stated as a supported finding. A valid credential, image or system entry proves only what that item can independently support.
INTERVIEWING OFFICER — sealed electronic signature held separately
Evidence custodian — receipt and hash recorded
END OF CONTROLLED RECORD — CTC-010