Overview
This dossier contains confidential records for Callum Hayes.
Material is provisional, cross-referenced from recovered files, protected records, and field notes.
COT / MI5 Case File
Restricted
Eyes Only
Maritime Evidence Dossier
Callum Hayes
Subject: Callum Hayes
FORMAL SAFETY INTERVIEW RECORD
SUBJECT: Callum Hayes
CLASSIFICATION: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE // SAFETY INVESTIGATION
REFERENCE: CONTROLLED COPY // COT/MARINE/2035/CTC041
Document control
CASE REFERENCE: COT/MARINE/2035/CTC041
SUBJECT: Callum Hayes
CENTRAL RECORD: COT249F3C987FF06
RANK / APPOINTMENT: Lieutenant / mariner
ORGANISATION: Merchant maritime service
VESSEL / POSTING: MV Argus
DATE OF BIRTH: 2000-10-28
PLACE / NATIONALITY: Aberdeen, Scotland, British
INTERVIEW STATUS: Witness / account holder
LOCATION: Secure interview suite — location withheld
DATE: 19 September 2035
LEAD AUTHORITY: Marine Accident Investigation Branch
RECORDING MEDIA: Two sealed digital masters and one independent evidential hash
DISTRIBUTION: Named recipients only. No automated onward distribution.
NOTE: Handling notice. This document contains operational, personal and evidential material. It may be read only by a person with both the required clearance and a recorded need to know. Extraction of images, transcript segments or metadata creates a new controlled copy.
Identity and visual evidence control
VISUAL ASSET STATUS: Passport image: attached; dossier image frames available: 3; surveillance frames available: 1; identity match: matched by subject/asset map.
Reason for interview or reconstruction
This record concerns the subject's knowledge of events, communications and decisions under active investigation. The scope of this record is confined to the matters set out above and to evidence formally introduced during the session.
Preliminary investigator note
The subject was cooperative on chronology and guarded on attribution. Answers became more exact when the interviewers distinguished direct observation from later analysis.
Recorded interview transcript
LEAD INSPECTOR: State your full name for the record.
CALLUM HAYES: Callum Hayes
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you understand the status of this interview and the limits placed on distribution?
CALLUM HAYES: Yes. Record that I have asked for the original media and audit trail to be preserved.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Have you been offered the representation, legal advice or staff support applicable to this procedure?
CALLUM HAYES: Yes.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-01 Retained extract: Investigators retained a record concerning the retained record concerning Callum Hayes.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
CALLUM HAYES: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What did you understand at that moment, before later analysis supplied a larger explanation?
CALLUM HAYES: The values agree with one another. Agreement is not proof that they describe the real world. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-02 Retained extract: Investigators retained a record concerning the retained record concerning Callum Hayes.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
CALLUM HAYES: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Who else was physically present and capable of confirming your account without relying on the same electronic record?
CALLUM HAYES: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
CALLUM HAYES: I am saying you should preserve the contradiction instead of choosing the tidier version.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-03 Retained extract: Investigators retained a record concerning the retained record concerning Callum Hayes.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
CALLUM HAYES: The values agree with one another. Agreement is not proof that they describe the real world. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Why was the matter not escalated through the ordinary reporting route?
CALLUM HAYES: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
[Exhibit S-01 introduced. Subject permitted to inspect the displayed copy without handling the source medium.]
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you identify the person shown as yourself?
CALLUM HAYES: I identify myself in the frame. I cannot authenticate the date from the crop alone.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Can you establish the location or date from anything visible in the frame?
CALLUM HAYES: The location is supportable from the surroundings. The purpose you are implying is not.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Were you aware that the image was being made?
CALLUM HAYES: I was not aware of the camera at the time shown.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Who had advance knowledge of your presence at that location?
CALLUM HAYES: That depends on whether the source is an official system, a copied feed or a separate observer.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What does this image prove, and what does it not prove?
CALLUM HAYES: Preserve the frames before and after it. A single image is a fact about light, not a complete account of conduct.
[Exhibit S-02 introduced. Subject permitted to inspect the displayed copy without handling the source medium.]
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you identify the person shown as yourself?
CALLUM HAYES: I identify myself in the frame. I cannot authenticate the date from the crop alone.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Can you establish the location or date from anything visible in the frame?
CALLUM HAYES: The location is supportable from the surroundings. The purpose you are implying is not.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Were you aware that the image was being made?
CALLUM HAYES: I was not aware of the camera at the time shown.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Who had advance knowledge of your presence at that location?
CALLUM HAYES: That depends on whether the source is an official system, a copied feed or a separate observer.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What does this image prove, and what does it not prove?
CALLUM HAYES: Preserve the frames before and after it. A single image is a fact about light, not a complete account of conduct.
[Exhibit S-03 introduced. Subject permitted to inspect the displayed copy without handling the source medium.]
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you identify the person shown as yourself?
CALLUM HAYES: I identify myself in the frame. I cannot authenticate the date from the crop alone.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Can you establish the location or date from anything visible in the frame?
CALLUM HAYES: The location is supportable from the surroundings. The purpose you are implying is not.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Were you aware that the image was being made?
CALLUM HAYES: I was not aware of the camera at the time shown.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Who had advance knowledge of your presence at that location?
CALLUM HAYES: That depends on whether the source is an official system, a copied feed or a separate observer.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What does this image prove, and what does it not prove?
CALLUM HAYES: Preserve the frames before and after it. A single image is a fact about light, not a complete account of conduct.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Is there any material fact you have withheld because you consider this recording or its distribution unsafe?
CALLUM HAYES: No fact material to immediate safety. Other matters require a narrower compartment.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What is the single next action this investigation should take?
CALLUM HAYES: Speak to the people who were physically present before asking another database to explain them.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you wish to add or correct anything before the recording is suspended?
CALLUM HAYES: Preserve the questions I declined. They may matter more than the answers you expected.
[Recording suspended. Source media sealed. Any resumed session requires a new opening declaration and exhibit schedule.]
Supplemental visual evidence exhibits
Confidential investigator assessment
The subject repeatedly separated instrument output from physical observation. That distinction is supported by known discrepancies in the retained material and should be preserved in any summary.
Actions and inconsistencies outstanding
- Recover acquisition authority, original-resolution files and adjacent frames for every surveillance exhibit.
NOTE: Finding limit. Nothing in this record establishes guilt, operational direction or final causation unless expressly stated as a supported finding. A valid credential, image or system entry proves only what that item can independently support.
LEAD INSPECTOR — sealed electronic signature held separately
Evidence custodian — receipt and hash recorded
END OF CONTROLLED RECORD — CTC-041