Overview
This dossier contains confidential records for Raul Manuel Diaz.
Material is provisional, cross-referenced from recovered files, protected records, and field notes.
COT / MI5 Case File
Restricted
Eyes Only
Maritime Evidence Dossier
Raul Manuel Diaz
Subject: Raul Manuel Diaz
FORMAL SAFETY INTERVIEW RECORD
SUBJECT: Raul Manuel Diaz
CLASSIFICATION: OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE // SAFETY INVESTIGATION
REFERENCE: CONTROLLED COPY // COT/MARINE/2035/CTC014
Document control
CASE REFERENCE: COT/MARINE/2035/CTC014
SUBJECT: Raul Manuel Diaz
CENTRAL RECORD: COT6C33AEFF00467
RANK / APPOINTMENT: Hidden witness, engineer and hard-copy evidence courier
ORGANISATION: Former Royal Navy / private technical contractor / lawful witness protection
VESSEL / POSTING: MS Orion Star (undeclared contractor)
ALIAS / CODENAME: R. Diaz
DATE OF BIRTH: 1994-03-22
PLACE / NATIONALITY: Classified, Classified, Not established; former Royal Navy systems engineer
INTERVIEW STATUS: Witness / account holder
LOCATION: Secure interview suite — location withheld
DATE: 26 September 2035
LEAD AUTHORITY: Marine Accident Investigation Branch
RECORDING MEDIA: Two sealed digital masters and one independent evidential hash
DISTRIBUTION: Named recipients only. No automated onward distribution.
NOTE: Handling notice. This document contains operational, personal and evidential material. It may be read only by a person with both the required clearance and a recorded need to know. Extraction of images, transcript segments or metadata creates a new controlled copy.
Identity and visual evidence control
VISUAL ASSET STATUS: Passport image: attached; dossier image frames available: 2; surveillance frames available: 0; identity match: review required before publication.
Visual asset review note: Review: image asset is Raul Esteban Diaz; SQL middle name differs.
Reason for interview or reconstruction
This record concerns the subject's knowledge of bridge and associated decisions. The scope of this record is confined to the matters set out above and to evidence formally introduced during the session.
Preliminary investigator note
The subject was cooperative on chronology and guarded on attribution. Answers became more exact when the interviewers distinguished direct observation from later analysis.
Recorded interview transcript
LEAD INSPECTOR: State your full name for the record.
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: Raul Manuel Diaz
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you understand the status of this interview and the limits placed on distribution?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: Yes. I also understand that a classification marking is a handling instruction, not proof of integrity.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Have you been offered the representation, legal advice or staff support applicable to this procedure?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: Yes. I am proceeding under the conditions already stated.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-01 Retained extract: The other had no death certificate at all. Associated persons: Tanner — Argus engineer, Singh — Argus second engineer, Patel — Argus junior engineer Relevant systems or locations: bridge
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The timing is supportable. Attribution is not. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What did you understand at that moment, before later analysis supplied a larger explanation?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-02 Retained extract: Beltran presented it.” “Did Beltran take orders from Diaz?” Zhang looked away from the still and considered the question rather than the implication inside it. Associated persons: Wei Zhang, Leon Beltran
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The timing is supportable. Attribution is not. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Who else was physically present and capable of confirming your account without relying on the same electronic record?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The values agree with one another. Agreement is not proof that they describe the real world. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying two honest records can disagree when they were generated from the same compromised source.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-03 Retained extract: Zhang watched it a second time without being asked. “He was trying to get Diaz off the ship,” he said. “What makes you say that?” Fiona asked. Associated persons: Wei Zhang
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. If the original is no longer available, that absence should remain part of your finding.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Why was the matter not escalated through the ordinary reporting route?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. Wei Zhang can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-04 Retained extract: Hundreds of legitimate movements.” “Any reason to believe Diaz is still there?” “No,” Natalie said. “Only a reason to look.” Associated persons: Martin Crowley
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What part of the retained record is incomplete or misleading?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying you should preserve the contradiction instead of choosing the tidier version.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-05 Retained extract: He used windows, polished vehicle panels and the convex safety mirrors mounted above the bays. “Confirmed,” Natalie said. “Diaz is alive.” No one answered with relief.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Which physical record should be examined before this account is treated as settled?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-06 Retained extract: Diaz placed the black one beside it.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Did anyone instruct you to describe the incident differently afterwards?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying two honest records can disagree when they were generated from the same compromised source.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-07 Retained extract: When it cleared, Diaz was gone.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What did you understand at that moment, before later analysis supplied a larger explanation?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-08 Retained extract: Crowley entered R.DIAZ into the six-character contractor slot. Associated persons: Martin Crowley, Commander Lydia Green
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Who else was physically present and capable of confirming your account without relying on the same electronic record?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. Check the physical record against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying two honest records can disagree when they were generated from the same compromised source.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-09 Retained extract: Diaz’s motive remained unknown.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Why was the matter not escalated through the ordinary reporting route?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-10 Retained extract: FINAL STATEMENT CONTAINED DELIBERATE PROTECTIVE OMISSION AND DELAYED-VALIDATION TRAIL TO RAUL DIAZ. Associated persons: Martin Crowley
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What part of the retained record is incomplete or misleading?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. Martin Crowley can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying you should preserve the contradiction instead of choosing the tidier version.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-11 Retained extract: Send the historical scanner pings and cargo identifiers, not the live position.” Natalie sent the Rotterdam and Zeebrugge references, delayed scanner hits and Diaz-linked case identifiers, withholding the Dover team’s position. Relevant systems or locations: Rotterdam, Dover
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The values agree with one another. Agreement is not proof that they describe the real world. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Which physical record should be examined before this account is treated as settled?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. Check Rotterdam against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-12 Retained extract: DIAZ - ORIGINALS UNRECOVERED / ROUTE CLONED WARD - CONTAINMENT FAILURE / PUBLICLY COMPROMISED Associated persons: Fiona Ward
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The values agree with one another. Agreement is not proof that they describe the real world. Check the physical record against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Did anyone instruct you to describe the incident differently afterwards?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The timing is supportable. Attribution is not. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying the record should remain evidence, not become an alibi for the system that produced it.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-13 Retained extract: Diaz's originals are still missing. Relevant systems or locations: Orpheus
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The values agree with one another. Agreement is not proof that they describe the real world. Check Orpheus against the unprocessed record before you accept the later label.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What did you understand at that moment, before later analysis supplied a larger explanation?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-14 Retained extract: Not enough to locate Raul Diaz. Relevant systems or locations: Orpheus, Eastern Channel
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The timing is supportable. Attribution is not. My answer is limited to what I personally saw, heard or ordered.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Who else was physically present and capable of confirming your account without relying on the same electronic record?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I preserved the raw state before testing the explanation. Anything else would have changed the evidence. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying it may be accurate about the event and wrong about the cause.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-15 Retained extract: The value was the check pair produced when R.DIAZ occupied the six-character contractor field Beltran had deliberately left blank. Associated persons: Leon Beltran, Martin Crowley Relevant systems or locations: Orpheus, archive
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The values agree with one another. Agreement is not proof that they describe the real world. The missing interval matters more than the wording placed around it afterwards.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Why was the matter not escalated through the ordinary reporting route?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The timing is supportable. Attribution is not. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBIT D-16 Retained extract: New coordinates—three nautical miles farther east. Relevant systems or locations: Orpheus
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you accept that this extract accurately records an event in which you were involved?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: The timing is supportable. Attribution is not. the person who held the contemporaneous log can confirm the sequence, but not necessarily the interpretation.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What part of the retained record is incomplete or misleading?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: That is what the system reported. It is not necessarily what the equipment physically did. I will not improve my memory to make the chronology easier.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Are you saying the official record is wrong?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: I am saying two honest records can disagree when they were generated from the same compromised source.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Is there any material fact you have withheld because you consider this recording or its distribution unsafe?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: Yes. The existence of that fact is the most I will place in this copy.
LEAD INSPECTOR: What is the single next action this investigation should take?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: Find the first system that accepted an answer without asking who had authority to give it.
LEAD INSPECTOR: Do you wish to add or correct anything before the recording is suspended?
RAUL MANUEL DIAZ: Record the pauses as well as the words.
[Recording suspended. Source media sealed. Any resumed session requires a new opening declaration and exhibit schedule.]
Supplemental visual evidence exhibits
Confidential investigator assessment
The subject repeatedly separated instrument output from physical observation. That distinction is supported by known discrepancies in the retained material and should be preserved in any summary.
Actions and inconsistencies outstanding
- Obtain or compare the independent account of Martin Crowley; do not disclose this transcript before their unaided account is fixed.
- Obtain or compare the independent account of Wei Zhang; do not disclose this transcript before their unaided account is fixed.
- Obtain or compare the independent account of Leon Beltran; do not disclose this transcript before their unaided account is fixed.
- Preserve and independently verify the original record associated with Orpheus, including audit history and physical custody.
- Preserve and independently verify the original record associated with bridge, including audit history and physical custody.
- Preserve and independently verify the original record associated with Rotterdam, including audit history and physical custody.
NOTE: Finding limit. Nothing in this record establishes guilt, operational direction or final causation unless expressly stated as a supported finding. A valid credential, image or system entry proves only what that item can independently support.
LEAD INSPECTOR — sealed electronic signature held separately
Evidence custodian — receipt and hash recorded
END OF CONTROLLED RECORD — CTC-014